- Polymarket filed a federal lawsuit in opposition to Massachusetts, arguing the CFTC has unique authority over occasion contracts and that state interference would trigger “irreparable hurt” to nationwide markets.
- The authorized strike follows a Massachusetts choose’s latest order forcing rival platform Kalshi to geofence state residents after its sports activities contracts had been labeled “unlicensed playing.”
- As comparable battles unfold in Nevada and Tennessee, the case will decide if prediction markets function underneath a single federal framework or a patchwork of state-level playing legal guidelines.
Prediction market large Polymarket has formally filed a federal lawsuit in opposition to Massachusetts Legal professional Common Andrea Pleasure Campbell and state gaming regulators.
The go well with argues the state can’t transfer to close down the platform as a result of Congress gave the Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC) unique authority over federally regulated “occasion contracts”.
As Crypto Information Australia reported, Polymarket received CFTC approval in late 2025 to supply regulated, intermediated buying and selling within the US, after a settlement that included a US$1.4 million (AU$2.14 million) penalty tied to earlier unregistered exercise.
Associated: Prediction Market Kalshi Hit With Class Action Alleging Illegal Sports Betting and Rigged Market-Making
Polymarket’s Authorized Struggles in Massachusetts
Neal Kumar, Polymarket’s chief authorized officer, mentioned on Monday the dispute considerations nationwide markets and open authorized questions that needs to be determined in federal court docket, not by means of state enforcement actions, and that Massachusetts legislation enforcement would trigger “irreparable hurt” by fragmenting a nationwide market and disrupting operations.
Kumar additionally pointed to comparable actions in Nevada, the place each Kalshi and Polymarket are going through state challenges because the court docket rejected federal preemption arguments and ordered geoblocking or shutdowns.
The CFTC can be reassessing how lively it needs to be in these disputes, with Chair Michael Selig signaling attainable help by means of amicus briefs or intervention as the difficulty strikes by means of increased courts.
Just a few days in the past, a state choose dominated Kalshi’s sports activities occasion contracts require a state playing license, denied a request to pause the ruling, and set a 30-day interval for the platform to geofence customers in Massachusetts whereas it appeals.
Kalshi argues its CFTC-regulated occasion contracts are derivatives, not playing, and says it’s going to proceed to battle the ruling. Sports activities contracts at the moment are the biggest share of Kalshi’s quantity, making the restrictions materials.
Learn extra: Bitcoin Slump Hits Saylor’s Strategy at the Worst Possible Moment
The publish Polymarket Makes Move Against Massachusetts, Says States Can’t Override Federal Oversight appeared first on Crypto News Australia.
