• Social media customers identified conflicting Bitcoin forecasts the place one senior strategist predicted a drop to $60,000 whereas the agency’s co-founder focused $200,000.
  • Supporters defended the discrepancy by explaining that the analysts concentrate on totally different targets akin to short-term threat administration versus long-term macro tendencies.
  • Tom Lee endorsed the reason that these views should not contradictions however fairly totally different frameworks for institutional and retail traders.

An argument on X over whether or not Fundstrat is giving conflicting Bitcoin calls picked up over the weekend, after customers shared screenshots exhibiting totally different eventualities from two of the agency’s senior figures.

The controversy began when an account referred to as “Heisenberg” posted photographs he mentioned contrasted Fundstrat views. 

Learn extra: Deutsche Bank Backs Coinbase’s “Everything Exchange” With Bullish US$340 Target

One remark attributed to Sean Farrell, Fundstrat’s head of digital asset technique, described a base case the place bitcoin might fall again to US$60,000–US$65,000 (AU$91,800–AU$99,450) within the first half of 2026.

Level of Battle

One other pointed to public feedback from Fundstrat co-founder Tom Lee suggesting Bitcoin might hit new all-time highs, with targets as excessive as US$200,000 (AU$306,000) by late January 2026.

Some customers questioned whether or not Fundstrat was contradicting itself or sending unclear steerage. A Fundstrat consumer on X, who goes by Cassian, pushed again, saying the comparability was deceptive as a result of senior workers cowl totally different roles fairly than producing one unified forecast. 

Cassian mentioned Farrell’s framework is extra about threat administration and that lowering crypto publicity in a mannequin portfolio is usually a defensive transfer with out implying a long-term bearish view. Lee, he mentioned, focuses extra on macro liquidity and broader market shifts, together with the concept that institutional adoption and exchange-traded merchandise might change BTC’s normal four-year cycle. 

Lee appeared to again that clarification by replying, “Properly said”, to Cassian’s submit. Neither Lee nor Farrell has issued a proper assertion addressing the screenshots straight.

Typically talking, Tom Lee has made a number of contradicting statements and even backed off from a few of his massive Bitcoin predictions. In late November, when BTC was recovering from a large 30% drop in October, Lee dialed again his forecast by year-end, not standing by the goal of US$250K (AU$382K), however as an alternative only a retest at US$125K (AU$191K).

Learn extra: Australia Reaches Its ‘Kodak Moment’ as Stablecoins Poised to Redefine National Finance, Says Report

The submit Fundstrat Faces Mixed-Signal Scrutiny as Bitcoin Forecasts Clash on X appeared first on Crypto News Australia.